The leftist media were more than happy to peddle that line. Here’s the actual law I had to read to them: Indeed, after Schultz made her claim, Massie delivered the goods, posting on Twitter/X images of the actual statute from 2021 confirming that, indeed, the mandated tech would “prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if impairment is detected.”ĭuring debate last night on my amendment to defund the 2026 kill-switch mandate for cars, some Democrats claimed the technology wouldn’t monitor or disable cars. Given her sketchy background running the Democratic National Committee (DNC, from 2011 to 2016), where leaked emails revealed that, under her “rule” the DNC favored Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders for the party Presidential nomination, and her evident lack of discernment in hiring (her former staffer, Imran Awan, and Awan’s wife were arrested in 2017 and charged with attempting to defraud the Congressional Federal Credit Union – itself kinda a big fraud pulled on all of us) one might wonder why she so emphatically tried to look like she was taking the “high road” on the mandate issue.Īnd one might not be surprised to discover that her claim was completely decoupled from reality – that she “pulled a kill switch on the truth.” It does not do that.”Īnd then she spouted pat lines about “passive drunk-driving technology” being a “vital tool in safeguarding our loved ones and other innocent people on our roads.” The act that the gentleman is trying to defund does NOT require auto manufacturers to install kill switches. Indeed, Wasserman Schultz seemed to chastise Massie, saying: She also insinuated that to oppose this federal mandate is akin to promoting drunk-driving. Indeed, not only did it not pass, Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FLA) took extra time out of her day (and used our tax cash) to not only oppose Massie, but to claim that this was not a mandate to impose something that would shut off a vehicle. It almost sounds like the domain of science-fiction, dystopian science-fiction, that the federal government would put a kill switch in vehicles that would be the judge, the jury, and the executioner on such a fundamental right as the right to travel freely.”īut, as one might have bet, his amendment did not pass. It’s so incredible that I have to offer this amendment. It will defund the federal mandate that requires all new vehicles after 2026 be equipped with a kill switch that can disable a vehicle if the vehicle has monitored the driver’s performance and that the vehicle ‘determines’ that the driver is not performing well. He also is an engineer who holds multiple patents, so he understands both the unconstitutional nature of this mandate, and the unworkability of it. Massie not only is a man who almost always votes to follow the US Constitution. The signpost is a warning for more federal government tyranny, coming in 2026.Īfter discovering that a 1,039 page 2021 statute called the “ Infrastructure and Jobs Act” includes in it a provision mandating that, beginning in ‘26, automobile manufacturers must install a monitoring-and-shut-down "safety" system for all vehicles, Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY) tried on November 7 to eliminate the mandate. Comparing the pro-Constitution position of the congressman who tried to revoke a federal mandate for what he deems automobile “shut-off” devices to the positions of colleagues who pushed and propagandized in favor of keeping it might be an exercise in, as Rod Serling said at the start of each “Twilight Zone,” seeing the “ signpost, up ahead.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |